Are You Ever Too Old to Have a Baby?

Are You Ever Too Old to Have a Baby?
The Ethical Challenges of Older Women
Using Infertility Services
Art L. Caplan, Ph.D.,1 and Pasquale Patrizio, M.D., M.B.E.

ABSTRACT
Older parenthood raises a variety of important factual and ethical questions. None
of the questions have received sufficient attention despite the rapid expansion in the United
States and other nations in the numbers of older parents. We do not know much about the
safety, economic, and psychosocial impact of these emerging practices on children or
parents. Nor have there been many analytical considerations of the ethical issues raised. We
argue in this article that there are reasons for concern when older persons seek to utilize
fertility treatments, including the safety of pregnancy for older women, risks posed to
children delivered by older mothers, issues around what constitutes safe conditions for
having a child relative to the age of parents, and the importance of guaranteeing that
someone will serve in the parental role should an older parent or parents become disabled or
die. To protect the best interest of children created by technology in new familial
circumstances, internationally recognized and enforced standards for fertility clinics to
follow ought to be enacted in making decisions about treating older parents seeking
infertility services.

KEYWORDS: Older parents, age limits, right to reproduce, best interest of children,
postmenopausal reproduction

Programs offering fertility services in the United
States and other nations are increasingly faced with
requests from women of advanced reproductive age
seeking assistance in becoming pregnant. Oocyte donation,
new drugs, the technique of single intracytoplasmic
sperm injection, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) afford
older women the opportunity to give birth well beyond
the natural limit imposed by menopause, and more and
more women are taking advantage of this opportunity.1–
4 With egg freezing transitioning rapidly into a therapeutic
option, it can be anticipated that more and more
younger women will freeze their eggs for future use
either in old age or even after their deaths.

Older parenthood does and should raise a variety
of important factual and ethical questions. None of the
questions have received sufficient attention despite the
expansion in the numbers of older parents. We do not
know much about the safety, economic, and psychosocial
impact of these emerging practices on children or parents.
Nor have there been many analytical considerations
of the ethical issues raised. Although it is
imperative that more be done to monitor and evaluate
1Director,Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; 2Professor, Obstetrics andGynecology, andDirector, Yale
University Fertility Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Pasquale Patrizio,
M.D.,M.B.E., Professor, Obstetrics andGynecology, andDirector, Yale
University Fertility Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
(e-mail: pasquale.patrizio@yale.edu).
Ethical Controversies in Reproductive Medicine;Guest Editor,Mark V.
Sauer, M.D.
SeminReprodMed 2010;28:281–286.Copyright#2010 by Thieme
Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001,
USA. Tel: +1(212) 584-4662.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255175.
ISSN 1526-8004.
281
Downloaded by: Yale University Library. Copyrighted material.
older parenting, which uses infertility technology including
postmortem birth, this article will focus on the
key ethical questions raised.

One core ethical question is how to describe older
parenting (and postmortem) fertility treatment. Are
these instances of human experimentation and should
doctors providing these services be held to the standard
ethical requirements governing clinical research? If new
technologies are being tried in novel ways where the risks
and benefits are not well known, there may be a case for
insisting that infertility interventions for patients who
are very old only be done by doctors who have constructed
research protocols and had them approved by
appropriate peer review bodies.

Other questions abound. Should infertility programs
discourage, tolerate, or encourage pregnancy in
old age? Or, instead, should ethical programs try to
discourage and constrain who it is that can bear a child
in their later years? Should restrictions be in place on
advertising and marketing in magazines, the Web, and
other forums for fertility services that target older
persons? And should governments, private insurance
companies, and other third-party payers pay for fertility
treatments for older patients?

GROWTH IN OLDER PARENTING
There is no question that the phenomenon of postmenopausal
women seeking to become pregnant through
egg donation has increased greatly in the past decade.6 In
the United States between 1996 and 2006, the birth rate
for women ages 40 to 44 increased by 50% and for those
37 to 39 years of age by 70%. Although a very small
number of these births occurred spontaneously, most are
attributable to egg donation and the utilization of IVF.
In 2003, there were 263 births reported in women
between the ages of 50 and 54.
Among the oldest women to give birth
using IVF in the past decade are:

1999: Harriet Stole of Southgate, North London,
who gave birth to a son in April 1999, at the age of
66. She had agreed to be a surrogate mother for her
infertile daughter-in-law, Lucy Handerson. Lucy and
her husband, Harriet’s son, Ross Stole, had Lucy’s egg
fertilized with Ross’ sperm and then implanted into
Harriet’s womb. The child was born prematurely at
8 months, weighing 4 pounds, 5 ounces, but survived
and has had no further known medical problems as he
has grown up.

2003: SatyabhamaMahapatra of Nayagarh, Orissa,
India gave birth to a son on April 9, 2003, at the age of 65.
The baby, weighing 6 pounds, 8 ounces (2.95 kg), was
born by caesarean section. Mahapatra became pregnant
through the help of IVF, using an egg donated by her
26-year-old niece and sperm from her husband, Krishnachandra.
This was their first child after 50 years of
marriage. Doctors had attempted to persuade her and
her husband not to undergo IVF due to the risks involved.
Mahapatra was hospitalized for the last trimester of her
pregnancy.

2005: Adriana Iliescu gave birth to two daughters
at a hospital in Bucharest, Romania on January 16,
2005, at the age of 66. After undergoing IVF using
donated eggs, Iliescu became pregnant with triplets.
One of the fetuses died in utero. The surviving two
were delivered by caesarean section. One baby died
shortly after birth.

2006: Maria del Carmen Bousada de Lara is the
oldest woman known to have given birth. She had twin
sons at Sant Pau Hospital in Barcelona, Spain on
December 29, 2006, at the age of 66—1 week shy of
her 67th birthday. The babies were delivered prematurely
by caesarean section and weighed 3.5 pounds
(1.6 kg) each. Bousada became pregnant after receiving
IVF treatment using donor eggs at the Pacific Fertility
Clinic in Los Angeles, California. She had no job, no
husband, and had sold her home to pay for the infertility
treatment. Doctors at the clinic claimed that Bousada
lied about her age, saying that she was 55. Her family
was unaware that she had gone to the United States to
undergo fertility treatment until she returned pregnant
to Spain. Bousada’s older brother criticized her decision,
expressing concern over whether she would be able to
raise children at her age. In response to such concerns,
Bousada stated, ‘‘My mother lived to be 101 and there’s
no reason I couldn’t do the same.’’ Maria died on July 11,
2009 from stomach cancer.

2007: An Austrian woman gave birth to her third
child in March 2007 at the age of 66. She had previously
given birth to another child, a girl weighing 6 pounds
(2.72 kg), in the middle of December 2002 at the age of
61. Her oldest child, a daughter, is 30. IVF was used in
both pregnancies. The Italian IVF specialist S. Antinori
oversaw the second. This is the only known case in the
world of two pregnancies and births involving the same
woman over the age of 60.

2008: Seventy-year-old Omkari Panwar gave
birth to twins, a boy and a girl, in India via emergency
cesarean section. The babies weighed 2 pounds each.
Omkari became pregnant through IVF treatment,
which she and her husband pursued to produce a
male heir. Omkari has two adult daughters and five
grandchildren. In response to hearing that she’d possibly
broken the record for world’s oldest mother, Omkari
stated, ‘‘If I am the world’s oldest mother it means
nothing to me. I just want to see my new babies and
care for them while I am still able.’’

2009: Elizabeth Adeney, aged 66, gave birth to
a 5 pound 3 ounce son in Addenbrooke’s Hospital,
Cambridge, England. The child, who was conceived
through IVF treatment in Ukraine from donor egg and
sperm, was delivered by caesarean section on May 28th.
282 SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE/VOLUME 28, NUMBER 4 2010
Downloaded by: Yale University Library. Copyrighted material.

WHY HAVE CHILDREN AT LATER AGES?
Why do women of later reproductive age want to have
children? Their motivations vary.

One reason is that new technology exists that
permit the creation of children, and it is widely available
in all parts of the world. For example, there are at least 20
infertility programs operating in nations in the Middle
East. Some are operated in collaboration with British,
German, Australian, or other non–Middle Eastern infertility
programs. There are also programs operating in
Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and Egypt.8 And
there are programs operating in many nations including
Britain, India, Canada, Singapore, the Netherlands,
Australia, France, Brazil, Argentina, Israel, Spain, the
United States, and Germany.

In America, part of the explanation for woman
giving birth later in life involves the fact that women in
America are marrying later in life, often due to pursuit of
their careers or due to economic necessity and, consequently,
postponing motherhood. American women are
also bombarded by media messages that suggest that
technology can extend the age at which a woman can be
fertile with little difficulty.

‘‘Forty may be the new thirty,’’ but fertility drops
drastically after the age of 35. Despite media suggestions
that women can have a child at any age, some women do
not realize the low odds of having their own biological
child or what is involved in terms of cost and time using
infertility services to have a child after age 35.9 The aging
of the eggs is a well-known biological phenomenon, and
it is rarely emphasized that even with IVF the chances of
a successful pregnancy and a live birth are extremely low
(less than 5%) for women 43 or older.

During IVF, it was recently reported that only 1%
of the eggs collected in women between the age of 41
and 42 result in the production of a live-born baby.
The risk of a miscarriage during the first trimester
of a pregnancy for women older than 40 is also higher
(double) than the risk at age 35 or younger, 50% versus
22%, respectively.

Some older women have been involved in prolonged
infertility treatment for many years with no
success and have been referred to egg donation at older
ages. Others are divorced and remarried and want to
have children with their new husbands.

In other cases, women who never married are
deciding they wish to have a child even without a man
acting as a father. And in some cases, the death of a child
prompts a woman to attempt to have another child.

Less is known about the extent to which woman
are seeking to use technology to have children at older
ages in other nations. But the phenomenon is certainly
present and growing. Many couples who suffer from
infertility want to remove the shame of being childless or
to honor the desire to continue the family lineage and,
thus, seek infertility treatments. Some older couples will
use techniques such as sperm, egg, or embryo donation
but keep that fact a secret.

WHY IS OLD AGE AN ETHICAL PROBLEM?
The decision of women to have children later in life
using donor eggs and other forms of reproductive technologies
raises important ethical questions. Central
among these is whether there is an age at which a
woman should be viewed as ‘‘too old’’ to have a child.10
Why should this be? There may be risks associated with
pregnancy in an older woman that are simply too great
for mother or potential child to face.

If there is an age at which reproduction is simply
too risky, then should formal legal restrictions be placed
on access to infertility treatment based on age? Is that
consistent with national and international codes of
human rights that recognize a right to reproduce?
Should religious advisors and doctors not connected to
fertility clinics support the desire of older women to
reproduce, create that desire, tolerate it, or discourage it?

And why pick on women? Haven’t men been
having children in their old age since the reports offered
in the Bible down to the present day?

It is true that men have been able to father
children in their later years albeit in recent times not at
the ages attributed to the biblical sages. There is a report
of one man having his twentieth child at age 90. Some
see sexism when issues of older parenting are raised since
most questions arise about older women. However,
there are huge differences medically and ethically between
men and women having children at very old ages.

Men are not placed at any serious risk by the
process of generating sperm. And although there is some
evidence that older men are at risk of creating children
with a higher incidence of genetic problems and diseases,
15 the risk to children is far greater in women than
it is in men.

When older men historically had children, they
had younger wives who were still capable of giving birth.
This meant that the child would in all likelihood have at
least one biological parent available to play that key role.
That historically has not been true of most older woman
situations. Single older moms may not have the energy,
resources, or health to act as competent parents to
teenagers.

Also the biological facts are asymmetrical when
men and women of older ages seek to reproduce. Older
men do pass on genetic dangers at a higher rate to their
offspring.16 But women having babies at older ages put
themselves at serious risk and increase the risks faced by
their babies, especially when multiple embryo transfers
are involved.17 Pregnancy complications in older women
(women over 40) are well known. They include pregnancy-
induced hypertension, premature rupture of the
membranes, preterm delivery, vaginal bleeding, and
ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF OLDER WOMEN USING INFERTILITY SERVICES/CAPLAN, PATRIZIO 283
Downloaded by: Yale University Library. Copyrighted material.
gestational diabetes.8 Pregnancy exposes older women to
physical risks wholly different from those that younger
women face—risks to the cardiovascular system, along
with a much greater chance of postpartum hemorrhage
and cesarean section.

Those who favor allowing older women to
parent argue that studies on older mothers are misleading
because they include spontaneous pregnancies,
women who have not been prescreened prior to
pregnancy, women who are socioeconomically disadvantaged,
and women who were in poor health prior
to pregnancy. They contend that women over age 40
entering oocyte donation programs are typically rigorously
screened prior to acceptance into fertility programs.
But there are no data showing this is so.18 And
there are little data showing that older ‘‘fit’’ women
fare better than other older women when they have
children.

PROGRAMS LEFT TO MUDDLE THROUGH
IN MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT AGE
Without clear guidelines, concern about the ethical
propriety of the technologically driven extension of the
normal reproductive age is a matter of the marketplace.
If you can pay, you can probably find a clinic or a doctor
who will do what you want. And because the issue is
parenting and childbirth, many are reluctant to comment
or become involved in the ethical assessment of the
practice, much less suggest the imposition of limits
upon it.

As a result, thoughtful doctors and clinics not just
seeking a payday from women to pursue their goal of
having a child must struggle with the following questions:
How should the risks of pregnancy in older
women be weighed against the rights of women to
control their own reproductive lives? How should a
woman’s age and life expectancy factor into a clinic
policy concerning access to services? How hard should
a clinic try to establish what parenting arrangements
have been made in the event of the death or severe
disability of the would-be mother or father? What do we
know about the capacity for postmenopausal women to
parent infants and toddlers? What do we know about the
development of children resulting from such services and
how they fare as the children of comparatively aged
parents?

The last question has not been answered because
the long-term consequences of pregnancy in older
women are unknown. There are no mandatory registries
following older mothers or their children. Still, some
nations, notably the United Kingdom, have decided to
err on the side of caution and impose age limits on single
mothers seeking infertility treatment.4 This has led to
some women from the United Kingdom going overseas
to seek care in countries that lack restrictions.

Concerns about the children of older mothers
seem to fall into two categories: one is about the life
expectancy of the mothers and the fear that children will
be orphaned at an early age. The other is about the
health of the older mothers and the fear that they will
not have the energy and the stamina to care for children.

Those arguing in favor of allowing oocyte donation
for postmenopausal women say that society is
accepting of older men marrying younger women and
having children, so to deny treatment to older women
would be ageist and sexist. They also argue that grandparents
often take on the parenting role and ‘‘bring
economic stability, parental responsibility, and maturity
to the family unit.’’

There are also those who argue that each clinic
should figure out its own policy about age restrictions.
But is this consistent with patient rights to reproduce
and not to be discriminated against in using medical
services? And given the lucrative nature of fertility
treatments, how hard will clinics try to actually screen
much less enforce any age restrictions? Much publicity
follows from having the ‘‘oldest mom’’ in the world give
birth and that translates to prestige, prominence, and
profits.

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITS ON ACCESS
TO TREATMENT DUE TO AGE
Disciplinewide guidelines are inconsistent or entirely
lacking, so American programs have no generally accepted
standards to provide guidance in making decisions
about these patients. For example, the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) in Practice
Guidelines recommends that all recipients of oocyte
donation over the age of 45 undergo thorough medical
evaluation including cardiovascular testing and a highrisk
obstetric consultation before treatment. The guidelines
do not include recommendations for age restrictions,
however.

A statement from the ASRM Ethics Committee
asserts that oocyte donation to postmenopausal women
‘‘should be discouraged.’’ ASRM also holds that patients
and programs should determine on a case-by-case basis
whether a woman’s health, medical and genetic risks,
and provision for child rearing justify proceeding with
treatment.

Italy enacted a very restrictive policy governing
eligibility for infertility services in 2004. Heterosexual
couples—whether married or living together—in which
both persons are of potentially fertile age have access to
treatment. Homosexual couples, minors, and singles
(i.e., individuals who are not in a heterosexual relationship)
are not. Postmenopausal women cannot undergo
treatment. In fact, the Ministry of Health Guidelines
require that embryos that have been produced at the
request of women who are not ‘‘of potentially fertile age’’
284 SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE/VOLUME 28, NUMBER 4 2010
Downloaded by: Yale University Library. Copyrighted material.
shall not be implanted but rather collected in a central
repository. An unmarried couple in what the law terms
a ‘‘de facto’’ relationship qualities for treatment. However,
the law avoids defining in any detail what a de facto
relationship is, specifying only that it occurs whenever a
man and a woman live together.

Under the new Italian law, both parents-to-be
must be alive at the time the treatment begins. However,
if the man’s death occurs between the time of fertilization
and implantation, the process is not interrupted and
all fertilized embryos must be transferred.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
law enacted in 1990 in the United Kingdom, one
of the few nations to address older parents, determined
that recipients of donor oocytes should not be over age
45, based on the view that it is in the best interest of the
child to be parented into young adulthood.17 Another
clinician used the same argument—that children need an
adult to raise them until they can live independently—
but recommended that the treatment should be limited
to women under the age of 60.

IS THERE A BASIC RIGHT TO REPRODUCE
IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ETHICS?
In 1948, the United Nations Universal Declaration of
Human Rights declared in article 16 that ‘‘men and
women of full age, without limits due to race, nationality
or religion, have the right to found a family.’’22 In 1950,
the European Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in article 12 made
essentially the same statement (‘‘Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’’).

These documents are important, but if one looks
at them more closely, they do not and were not intended
to create a right for each person to reproduce. Rather,
they were intended to respect the right of persons to be
left alone and not coerced with respect to reproductive
choices.

There is a difference between negative rights—
the right to be left alone—and positive rights—the right
to claim entitlement to a service or a means to obtain
something. Nothing in these international covenants
and treaties recognizes the duty of the state or government
to supply single persons with mates much less
access to reproductive technologies.

Although governments can and do adopt pronatalist
stances encouraging people to marry and have
children by means of money, housing, or other perks,
there is no fundamental positive right to reproduce.
Moreover, some nations, such as China, have clearly
felt that even the negative right to be left alone can be
infringed if there is a grave danger posed to the state by
uncontrolled population expansion. Although that position
is certainly open to debate, there is no doubt that
nowhere is the positive right to reproduce recognized in
international law, treaties, covenants, or legislation. So
there is no legal obligation to provide older persons with
the technology requisite for them to reproduce.

CONCLUSIONS
There are many reasons why older parents having children
might be a commendable moral act. But there are
also a host of reasons for concern based on the safety of
pregnancy for older women, risks posed to children
delivered by older mothers, issues around what constitutes
safe conditions for having a child relative to the age
of parents, and a lack of data on the impact of older
parenting within and outside of marriage on children. It
would seem prudent in terms of trying to advance the best
interest of children to have some internationally recognized
standards that fertility clinics must follow in making
decisions about older parenting. And given the
uncertainties of how well very old parents can parent
and the known risks to mothers and children of pregnancy
in old age, it would seen morally appropriate to
demand thorough medical assessments of older candidates
for IVF; extensive examination of the precautions in
place to ensure a parent in the case of single, older
women; and the setting of restrictions on both the age
of women eligible to use infertility services as well as on
the number of embryos that ought be transferred per
cycle to older women.

REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Births 2007. In: Atlas of Health
in Europe, 2nd ed. 2008. Available at: http://www.euro.who.
int/Document/E91713.pdf.
2. American Society of Reproductive Medicine ethics committee.
Oocyte donation to post-menopausal women. Fertil
Steril 2004;82(Suppl 1):254–255
3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National vital
statistics reports, births: final data for 2006. Vol. 57, No. 7,
January 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_07.pdf.
4. RCOG. Statement on later maternal age. 2009. Available at:
http://www.rcog.org.uk/what-we-do/campaigning-andopinions/
statement/rcog-statement-later-maternal-age.
5. Patrizio P, Butts S, Caplan AL. Ovarian tissue preservation
and future fertility: emerging technologies and ethical considerations.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;34(34): 107–110
6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at: http://www.ausstats.
abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/DC32A0611500-
BAA0CA2574EF00142139/$File/33010_2007.pdf.
7. Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal age—how old is too old?
N Engl J Med 2004;351(19):1927–1929
8. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L. Perimenopausal conception. Ann
N Y Acad Sci 2003;997:93–104
9. Patrizio P, Greenfeld D. Ethics of Reproduction. In: Falcone
T, Hurd W, eds. Clinical Reproductive Medicine and
Surgery. Philadelphia; PA: Mosby - Elsevier; 2007:147–155

ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF OLDER WOMEN USING INFERTILITY SERVICES/CAPLAN, PATRIZIO 285
Downloaded by: Yale University Library. Copyrighted material.
10. Saletan W. Is it OK to impregnate a 60-year-old woman?
Slate. 2009. Available at: http://www.slate.com/id/2223900/.
11. Cohen CB, ed. New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of
Egg Donation. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press;
1996
12. Bromer J, Siano L, Benadiva C, Sakkas D, Patrizio P.
Reproductive efficiency of women over the age of 40 and the
low risk of multiple pregnancies. RBM on line. 2009;19(4):
4316–20
13. Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical
evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization.
Fertil Steril 2009;91:1061–1066
14. Holmes HB, Purdy LM, eds. Feminist Perspectives in
Medical Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press;
1992
15. Sloter E, Nath J, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male
age on the frequencies of germinal and heritable chromosomal
abnormalities in humans and rodents. Fertil Steril 2004;
81(4):925–943
16. Bray ID, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G. Advanced paternal
age: how old is too old? J Epidemiol Community Health
2006;60(10):851–853
17. Bushnik T, Garner R. The children of older first-time
mothers in Canada: their health and development. Statistics
Canada. September 2008. Available at: http://www.statcan.
gc.ca/pub/89-599-m/89-599-m2008005-eng.pdf.
18. Mahutte NG, Arici A. Poor responders: does the protocol
make a difference? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14(3):
275–281
19. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines for
gamete and embryo donation: a practice committee report.
Fertil Steril 2007;90(Suppl 3):530–544
20. Benagiano G, Gianaroli L. The new Italian IVF legislation.
Reprod Biomed Online 2004;9(2):117–125
21. Mori T. Egg donation should be limited to women below
60 years of age. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12(4):229–230
22. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
1948. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.
23. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. Available at: http://
conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm.
24. Sumner LW. The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford,
United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1987
25. Ravitsky V. Posthumous reproduction guidelines in Israel.
Hastings Cent Rep 2004;34(2):6–7
286 SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE/VOLUME 28, NUMBER 4 2010
Downloaded by

Lemon (Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells.

Hello!!! Just want to share this good information...........
By. Tehree P. O’Hearn ...........

Just cut 2-3 thin slices of lemon in a cup/container and add drinking water will become "alkaline water", drink for the whole day, just by adding drinking water. Take it as drinking water every day is good for everybody. The surprising benefits of lemon!I remain perplexed!================================
Institute of Health Sciences, 819 N. L.L.C. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 1201.This is the latest in medicine, effective for cancer! Read carefully & you be the judge

Lemon (Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells. It is 10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy. Why do we not know about that? Because there are laboratories interested in making a synthetic version that will bring them huge profits. You can now help a friend in need by letting him/her know that lemon juice is beneficial in preventing the disease. Its taste is pleasant and it does not produce the horrific effects of chemotherapy. How many people will die while this closely guarded secret is kept, so as not to jeopardize the beneficial multimillionaires large corporations? As you know, the lemon tree is known for its varieties of lemons and limes. You can eat the fruit in different ways: you can eat the pulp, juice press, prepare drinks, sorbets, pastries, etc... It is credited with many virtues, but the most interesting is the effect it produces on cysts and tumors. This plant is a proven remedy against cancers of all types. Some say it is very useful in all variants of cancer. It is considered also as an anti microbial spectrum against bacterial infections and fungi, effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure which is too high and an anti-depressant combats stress and nervous disorders.The source of this information is fascinating: it comes from one of the largest drug manufacturers in the world, says that after more than 20 laboratory tests since 1970, the extracts revealed that :It destroys the malignant cells in 12 cancers including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreas ... The compounds of this tree showed 10,000 times better than the product Adriamycin, a drug normally used chemotherapeutic in the world, slowing the growth of cancer cells. And what is even more astonishing: this type of therapy with lemon extract only destroys malignant cancer cells and it does not affect healthy cells.

Institute of Health Sciences, 819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street , Baltimore , MD1201

The attachment named image002.jpg;image001.jpg could not be scanned for viruses because it is a password protected file.

DISCLAIMER:Information in this message is confidential. It is intended solely for the person or the entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not to disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. Please notify the sender and delete the message and any other record of it from your system immediately.

Sex: Fact and Fiction

Sex: Fact and Fiction
What’s the average penis size? How fast is premature ejaculation? Exactly where is the G-spot? Grab a ruler and a stopwatch as the experts sort sex myths from the facts.
By Rob BaedekerWebMD Feature
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

If there were a roll call for the founding fathers of sex myths for men, a couple of no-brainers would surely make the list: porn legend John Holmes, whose yule-log-size penis still casts a shadow over anxiety-prone males. Ditto NBA-great Wilt Chamberlain, whose claim of having slept with 20,000 women makes Don Juan look monastic.
And then there's purveyor-of-sex-myths Walt Disney.
"I think Walt Disney creates a lot of mythology," says Seth Prosterman, PhD, a clinical sexologist and licensed marriage and family therapist practicing in San Francisco. "In Disney movies, people fall in love and walk into the sunset, and you get this myth that intimacy is a given once you fall in love, and sexuality is natural and follows that."
In reality, says Prosterman, "Sex is something that we learn throughout a lifetime."
If sexuality is a continuing education, a lot of us are scrambling to make up course credits. And in a realm that's clouded by ego, myth and advertising that preys on anxieties, getting the facts about sex can be difficult. What is the average size of the male penis? How long do most men last during intercourse? Can men have multiple orgasms? Does the G-spot exist, and if so, how do I find it?
(Need to talk to the guys about something? Check out the Men's Health: Man-to-Man message board for straight talk.)
Penis Size: The Hard Facts
"Drastically enlarge the penis length and width to sizes previously thought impossible!" reads a website for the Penis Enlargement Patch. (One envisions a lab-coated mad scientist pouring chemicals on his own penis, then shouting "Eureka!" and phoning the Guinness Book.) Almost anyone with an email account has been deluged by spam for such miracle-growth patches and pills, and the endurance of sex myths may explain the pervasiveness of such ads.
"We equate masculinity and power with penis size," says Ira Sharlip, MD, clinical professor of urology at the University of California at San Francisco and president of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. "Of course, there's really no relationship." Still, Sharlip says, "all" of his patients want to increase their penis size.
The idea that bigger is better is "not just total mythology," says Seth Prosterman, who has counseled couples since 1984 and notes that some of the women he's worked with do prefer a bigger penis -- aesthetically or "fit-wise." But, he adds, "For the vast majority of partners, penis size doesn't matter."
So what, exactly, constitutes a big penis? Let's whip out some data:
· The average penis size is between five and six inches. That's for an erect penis.
· The flaccid male organ averages around three and a half inches.

Sex Fact: We Are Not Our Penises
If you had an anxiety hiccup before you read the "erect" qualifier, consider it a metaphor for the danger of jumping to conclusions about penis size -- or about the primacy of the penis altogether.
"The idea that the penis is the most important part of your body underlies so many of men's sexual problems," says Cory Silverberg, a sexual health educator and founding member of Come As You Are, an education-based sex store in Toronto. "One of the biggest sex myths for men is the notion that we are our penises, and that's all that counts in terms of sex."
"It's a myth that using the penis is the main way to pleasure a woman," says Ian Kerner, PhD, a sex and relationships counselor in New York City whose book She Comes First offers a guide to "female orgasms and producing them through inspired oral techniques." In his book, Kerner cites a study that reports women reaching orgasm about 25% of the time with intercourse, compared with 81% of the time during oral sex.
OK, OK, Size Isn't Important. But How Can I Increase My Penis Size?
Despite the facts, the din of penis-enlargement marketing only seems to grow louder. ("Realize total and absolute power and domination in bed with your partner, with your new-found penis size and sexual performance" screams the ad for the Penis Enlargement Patch.) Men keep chasing after the mythical, mammoth-sized member.
Silverberg says male clients at his store, and in his counseling work, constantly ask him about penis pumps, whose powers of elongation, he says, are a "myth," although he adds that some men who've used them report satisfaction, a phenomenon he explains this way: "I think spending more time paying attention to our genitals will probably increase our sexual health."
Just the Facts on the G-Spot
If sex myths have such power over men's thinking about their own anatomy, they have even more sway when it comes to female partners' bodies -- especially the much-debated G-spot.
Named after a German doctor, Ernst Gräfenberg, who first wrote about an erogenous zone in the anterior vaginal wall, the G-spot was popularized by a 1982 book called ... The G-spot. This region behind the pubic bone is often credited as the trigger for a vaginal (vs. clitoral) orgasm, and even a catalyst for female ejaculation.
At the same time, the G-spot is commonly derided as perpetuating the myth ensconced by Sigmund Freud -- namely, that the clitoral orgasm is a "lesser" form of climax than the vaginal orgasm, which requires penile penetration. As Ian Kerner summarizes, "In Freud's view, there were no two ways about it: If a woman couldn't be satisfied by penetrative sex, something must be wrong with her."
The G-spot's existence is still debated, and whether it's fact or fiction depends on whom you ask.
"The G-spot exists," says Seth Prosterman. "It's a source of powerful orgasm for a percentage of women."
"I don't think the G-spot exists," says Ira Sharlip. "As urologists, we operate in that area [where the G-spot should be] and there just isn't anything there -- there's no anatomical structure that's there."
Prosterman and others point out the importance of thinking of the G-spot in context -- that it may be an extension of the clitoral anatomy, which extends back into the vaginal canal. Kerner writes that the G-spot may be "nothing more than the roots of the clitoris crisscrossing the urethral sponge."
Helen O'Connell, MD, head of the neurourology and continence unit at the Royal Melbourne Hospital Department of Urology in Australia, says, "The G-spot has a lot in common with Freud's idea of vaginal orgasms. It is a sexual concept, this time anatomical, that results in confusion and has resulted in the misconception that female sexuality is extremely complex."
In the end, whether this debated locus of pleasure is fact or fiction may not matter that much. O'Connell, who is also co-author of a 2005 Journal of Urology study on the anatomy of the clitoris, says that focusing on the G-spot to the exclusion of the rest of a woman's body is "a bit like stimulating a guy's testicles without touching the penis and expecting an orgasm to occur just because love is present." She says focusing on the inside of the vagina to the exclusion of the clitoris is "unlikely to bring about orgasm. It is best to think of the clitoris, urethra, and vagina as one unit because they are intimately related."
How Long, Part 2: How Premature Is Premature Ejaculation?
The possibilities for exploring a woman's erogenous zones may be tremendously exciting -- which leads to another source of sex myth and male anxiety: How long can I last? And how long should I be able to last?
Premature ejaculation is "the most common form of sexual dysfunction in younger men" according to Ira Sharlip, and its prevalence is around 20% to 30% in men of all ages.
The medical method of determining premature ejaculation is called "intravaginal ejaculatory latency time" (IELT), a stopwatch-timed duration measured from the beginning of vaginal penetration until ejaculation occurs. However, Sharlip adds, this quantitative measure doesn't tell the whole story: "There are men who ejaculate within a minute but say that they don't have premature ejaculation. And then on other end of spectrum, there are patients who are able to last for 20 minutes, and they say they do have premature ejaculation."
In other words, the definition of "premature" may be largely in the eye (or mind) of the beholder, and depends on a man's sexual satisfaction and his perception of his ability to control when ejaculation occurs.
If you just can't wait for the numbers, though, a 2005 study in the Journal of Sexual Medicine found "a median IELT of 5.4 minutes."
Ian Kerner says a common cutoff time used to define premature ejaculation is two minutes, but he adds that many of the men he works with "are not guys who can last a few minutes; they're having orgasms during foreplay, or immediately upon penetrating. They have a hard time lasting past 30 seconds."
But a quick trigger is normal, says Kerner. "Men were wired to ejaculate quickly -- and stressful situations make them ejaculate even more quickly. It's been important to the human race. If guys took an hour to ejaculate, we'd be a much smaller planet."
Sex therapists and physicians offer a number of techniques that can help men manage their anxiety and prolong their time to ejaculation. Several drugs -- like some antidepressants (used for off-label treatment) and topical sprays -- have been shown to extend time to ejaculation.
And, contrary to the common perception that distraction or decreasing stimulation is the answer (slow down, think about baseball), some say that giving in to sensation can help address the issue as well. "The way to learn [to last longer] is by getting used to intense stimulation," says Prosterman, "to increase the frequency of intercourse, and feel every sensation of being inside your partner and enjoy it."

Come Again? The Mythical Multiple Orgasm for Men
While multiple male orgasm is possible anywhere two or more men are gathered and talking, actual male multiple orgasm is another story. Unlike the more established phenomenon of female multiple orgasm, men's claims of successive climaxes can stray into the realm of sex myth. At the very least, male multiple orgasm is difficult to verify and may depend on the definition of orgasm.
Prosterman says that the book The Multi-Orgasmic Man popularized "an Eastern meditative process that involves wrapping the PC [pubococcygeus] muscle around the prostate. There's a valve on the prostate that switches on and off before urination and ejaculation. The PC muscle stops this valve from opening, allowing an orgasm without ejaculation. The idea is to keep doing that five or six times in a row.
"Out of hundreds of guys I know who've tried this," says Prosterman, "I know only one who's been able to do it."
Is this man Mr. Lucky, or just prone to poetic license?
A 1989 study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior recorded the testimony of 21 other men who claimed to be multi-orgasmic, but Ira Sharlip says "that doesn't happen," referring to the phenomenon of "multiple orgasms in succession over a short period of time -- like minutes." And there's no such thing as separating ejaculation and orgasm, he says.
Orgasm or Orgasm-esque?
What may be at issue here is the definition of orgasm -- which, according to a 2001 Clinical Psychology Review article, has been strikingly inconsistent. "Many definitions of orgasm "depict orgasm quantitatively as a 'peak' state that may not differentiate orgasm adequately from a high state of sexual arousal," the study's authors wrote.
In other words, those men who report multiple orgasms may be able to achieve orgasm-esque states before they hit the point of ejaculatory no-return. And many men report that strengthening the PC muscles through Kegel exercises allows them to edge closer to this "point of inevitability" without cresting the mountaintop of ejaculation and descending into the gentle valley of the flaccid and the "refractory" period, where the penis is temporarily unresponsive to sexual stimulation.
This refractory period -- commonly 30 minutes or more -- is an unfortunate reality. While you're "waiting," spending that time caressing, kissing, massaging, and nuzzling isn't so bad. If you are trying to have a second round because your partner wants it, keep sex toys in mind.
And if that recovery period isn't super quick, you can still enjoy multiple orgasms -- you may just need to cancel your afternoon appointments.
Sex Fact: It's Not Always about the Numbers
In the end, there seems to be a recurring theme in moving beyond sex myths: Don't get too hung up on the numbers.
So often the key to sexual satisfaction is not about penis size, stamina records, or a technical isolation of the G-spot. Rather, it's about understanding yourself and your partner's desires and recognizing that, unlike those Disney characters, real people aren't born with a perfect, divinely granted understanding of sex.
As O'Connell remarks on the perils of over-privileging of the G-spot, "It is best for partners to explore the precise areas that turn someone on and how a partner likes to be given pleasure. That applies to both men and women, and the idea that there is any consistent 'magic spot' in either sex is just tyrannical."

SIMPLE BUT EFFECTIVE EXERCISE

SIMPLE BUT EFFECTIVE EXERCISE
The essence of the exercise is that your "Eyes Must be Closed" when you are doing this exercise. You must practise the "Jin Ji Du Li" exercise with the eyes closed. This exercise was so simple and amazing that I thought I had to share it here.

Here is the exercise:

Stand on one leg while your eyes are closed. That is all. Just try it right now, stop reading and stand up, close your eyes and try standing on one foot.

If you are not able to stand for less than 10 seconds, it means that your body has degenerated to 60 to 70 years old level in other words, you may be only 40 years old, but your body has aged a lot faster.

I tried this exercise myself when I read the mail. I thought “oh, big deal, I’m sure I can do this easily” I was fooling myself, I’m glad I tried it because I discovered much to my surprise that while I could stand easily on one foot with my eyes open, trying the same thing with my eyes closed was another story! I just could not keep my balance for more than two to three seconds before I started wobbling and hopping around.

You do not need to lift your leg high, if your internal organs are out of synch, even lifting your leg this bit will make you wobble.

Now this was quite scary because it told me that my body was almost 60 years old and here was me, barely into my forties! It was very heartening to know that frequent and regular practice can help you recover your sense of balance. In fact Chinese specialists suggest daily practice of Jin Ji Du Li for 1 minute, this helps prevent dementia.

You can try slightly closing both eyes while practicing Jin Ji Du Li, instead of completely closing them; in fact this is what the health specialist Zhong Li Ba Ren recommends.

Daily practice of Jin Ji Du Li, can help in healing many illnesses or diseases like
Hypertension,
High Blood Sugar or diabetes,
Neck and Spinal diseases,
It can also prevent you from getting dementia.

Zhong Li Ba Ren has written a book titled "Self Help is Better than Seeking Doctors' Help", which is a bestselling book that has been the best seller health book in China since it was first published last year. Its success can be measured by the fact that it has been reprinted 12 times within 6 months, with more than 1 million copies sold. The book is a hot seller because is it teaches many simple practical health tips.

It is said that according to the understanding of Chinese physicians, diseases appear in the body because the coordination between the various internal organs encounter problems and that causes the body to lose its balance. Jin Ji Du Li can readjust this inter-relationship of the organs and how they function with each other. Zhong Li Ba Ren stated that many people can't stand on one foot with their eyes closed for even 5 seconds, but later on as they practice it daily, are able to stand for more than 2 minutes.

As you gain ability to stand for longer time, the feeling of "head heavy, light feet” disappears. As benefits or practising Jin Ji Du Li, you will experience that the quality of sleep improves, the mind clears up and memory improves significantly. Most importantly if you can practice Jin Ji Du Li with your eyes closed for 1 minute every day, you will not get dementia. (I think it this also means the brain will remain healthy).

Zhong Li Ba Ren explained that there are 6 important meridians passing through our legs. When you stand on a single leg, the weak meridian will feel sore while getting the necessary exercise, and as this happens, the corresponding organs of these meridians and their path-ways, start getting the necessary tuning. This method can focus or concentrate the awareness, and channel the body's qi to the foot. The beneficial effects of practising Jin Ji Du Li on various illnesses associated with hypertension, diabetes, neck and spinal diseases are quick to be seen and felt. Jin Ji Du Li can also prevent gout.

Jin Ji Du Li helps to Strengthen body Immunity rapidly

Jin Ji Du Li it is suitable for everyone generally. It is the basic cure for "Cold Feet Disease” and it can also strengthen the body’s immunity. You do not have to wait until you have any illness to start practising Jin Ji Du Li. It is especially beneficial for young people, when they practice it daily while they are healthy, so that their chances of contracting the various illness associated with aging is comparative lower.

Please note that it is not suitable for people over 70 years old, or those old people whose legs are not strong and cannot stand steadily.

You’re Guide to Better Sex in 10 Easy Steps.

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.